Member-only story

How To Use an LLM Without Selling Your Soul

A guide for busy writers

David Amos
The Writing Cooperative
7 min readFeb 2, 2025

Don’t lose your head. Photo by Mika Ruusunen on Unsplash

Around April of 2024, I was stuck in a terrifying situation for a technical writer: in need of a review and not a soul available to provide one. I had less than a month to finalize documentation for a complex product that didn’t even exist the prior December. Meanwhile, the subject matter experts were all busy subjecting matters to their expertise and anyone capable of a didactic review was thoroughly preoccupied. We were all frantically patching together a plane as it jockeyed down the runway, praying that the damn thing would take flight.

And so, in a fit of desperation, I found myself pleading with ChatGPT for an honest and professional review. Prompting a large language model (LLM) is spooky business. LLMs don’t think — not in the way you or I do, or, for that matter, any other biological organism inhabiting this mudball. How does one even communicate with such a thing? Brushing aside my trepidations, I decided to treat ChatGPT like a human:

Please review the following document for the provided target audience and
stated objectives.

TARGET AUDIENCE:
Data engineers familiar with Python, SQL, and the Snowflake Data Cloud.

OBJECTIVES:
1) Set up a local development environment and install the RelationalAI
(RAI) Python package.
2) Provide a good mental model for…

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Published in The Writing Cooperative

Medium’s largest collection of advice, support, and encouragement for writers. We help you become the best writer possible.

Written by David Amos

Professional technical writer, amateur everything else. Read my mind at https://thoughtcicles.xyz

Responses (1)

Write a response

I like to think of ChatGPT as a sort of interactive notebook — a journal that talks back.

Talking notebook, yeah. But one that sometimes writes nonsense in the margins. Still, beats waiting days for someone to mark it up.

--